202 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
202 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
![]() |
# Reflection System Alignment with AI-CDS Principles
|
||
|
|
||
|
## 1. Interface-Driven Development (IDD) Alignment
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Core Principles
|
||
|
- Our reflection system is built around explicit interface contracts
|
||
|
- Uses registration-based approach for type information
|
||
|
- Promotes modularity through clear component boundaries
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Implementation Strategy
|
||
|
1. Interface Definition
|
||
|
- Define clear contracts for reflection capabilities
|
||
|
- Separate core reflection interfaces from implementation
|
||
|
- Use interface segregation for specialized reflection needs
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Component Boundaries
|
||
|
- Separate metadata handling from runtime reflection
|
||
|
- Isolate platform-specific code from core reflection
|
||
|
- Clear separation between registration and resolution
|
||
|
|
||
|
## 2. Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) Alignment
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Core Behaviors
|
||
|
1. Type Resolution
|
||
|
- Discover and validate type information
|
||
|
- Handle constructor parameters
|
||
|
- Manage type relationships
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Instance Creation
|
||
|
- Create instances with dependencies
|
||
|
- Handle constructor overloads
|
||
|
- Manage lifecycle
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. Member Access
|
||
|
- Property get/set operations
|
||
|
- Method invocation
|
||
|
- Field access control
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Implementation Approach
|
||
|
- Define behaviors before implementation
|
||
|
- Use behavior specifications to drive API design
|
||
|
- Ensure consistent behavior across platforms
|
||
|
|
||
|
## 3. Test-Driven Development (TDD) Alignment
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Test Categories
|
||
|
1. Unit Tests
|
||
|
- Type reflection accuracy
|
||
|
- Instance creation scenarios
|
||
|
- Member access patterns
|
||
|
- Error handling cases
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Integration Tests
|
||
|
- Container integration
|
||
|
- Framework compatibility
|
||
|
- Cross-platform behavior
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. Performance Tests
|
||
|
- Resolution speed
|
||
|
- Memory usage
|
||
|
- Scalability metrics
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Test-First Approach
|
||
|
- Write tests before implementation
|
||
|
- Use tests to validate cross-platform behavior
|
||
|
- Ensure consistent error handling
|
||
|
|
||
|
## 4. AI Integration Points
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Code Generation
|
||
|
1. Registration Code
|
||
|
- AI generates type registration code
|
||
|
- Handles complex type relationships
|
||
|
- Manages metadata generation
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Test Generation
|
||
|
- Creates comprehensive test suites
|
||
|
- Generates edge cases
|
||
|
- Validates cross-platform behavior
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Optimization
|
||
|
1. Performance
|
||
|
- AI suggests optimization strategies
|
||
|
- Identifies bottlenecks
|
||
|
- Recommends caching strategies
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Memory Usage
|
||
|
- Optimizes metadata storage
|
||
|
- Reduces runtime overhead
|
||
|
- Manages resource cleanup
|
||
|
|
||
|
## 5. Cross-Platform Considerations
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Platform Independence
|
||
|
1. Core Features
|
||
|
- Pure Dart implementation
|
||
|
- No platform-specific dependencies
|
||
|
- Consistent behavior guarantee
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Platform Optimization
|
||
|
- Platform-specific optimizations where needed
|
||
|
- Fallback mechanisms for unsupported features
|
||
|
- Performance tuning per platform
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Compatibility Layer
|
||
|
1. Web Platform
|
||
|
- Handle JavaScript interop
|
||
|
- Manage tree-shaking
|
||
|
- Optimize for browser environment
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Native Platforms
|
||
|
- Optimize for AOT compilation
|
||
|
- Handle platform restrictions
|
||
|
- Manage memory efficiently
|
||
|
|
||
|
## 6. Laravel Framework Support
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Container Features
|
||
|
1. Service Location
|
||
|
- Type-based resolution
|
||
|
- Named instance management
|
||
|
- Contextual binding
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Dependency Injection
|
||
|
- Constructor injection
|
||
|
- Method injection
|
||
|
- Property injection
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Framework Integration
|
||
|
1. Service Providers
|
||
|
- Registration automation
|
||
|
- Lifecycle management
|
||
|
- Deferred loading support
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Middleware
|
||
|
- Dependency resolution
|
||
|
- Parameter injection
|
||
|
- Pipeline handling
|
||
|
|
||
|
## 7. AI-CDS Workflow Integration
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Development Workflow
|
||
|
1. Design Phase
|
||
|
- AI assists in interface design
|
||
|
- Generates reflection contracts
|
||
|
- Suggests optimization strategies
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Implementation Phase
|
||
|
- Generates registration code
|
||
|
- Creates test suites
|
||
|
- Provides optimization suggestions
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. Testing Phase
|
||
|
- Validates implementation
|
||
|
- Generates test cases
|
||
|
- Identifies edge cases
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. Refinement Phase
|
||
|
- Optimizes performance
|
||
|
- Improves memory usage
|
||
|
- Enhances error handling
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Continuous Improvement
|
||
|
1. Feedback Loop
|
||
|
- Performance metrics
|
||
|
- Usage patterns
|
||
|
- Error scenarios
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Optimization
|
||
|
- AI-driven improvements
|
||
|
- Platform-specific optimizations
|
||
|
- Resource usage optimization
|
||
|
|
||
|
## 8. Future Extensibility
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Enhancement Areas
|
||
|
1. Type System
|
||
|
- Enhanced generic support
|
||
|
- Better type inference
|
||
|
- Improved type safety
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Performance
|
||
|
- Smarter caching
|
||
|
- Better memory management
|
||
|
- Reduced overhead
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. Framework Support
|
||
|
- Additional framework features
|
||
|
- Extended container capabilities
|
||
|
- Enhanced middleware support
|
||
|
|
||
|
### AI Evolution
|
||
|
1. Code Generation
|
||
|
- More accurate registration code
|
||
|
- Better test coverage
|
||
|
- Improved optimization suggestions
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. Analysis
|
||
|
- Enhanced performance analysis
|
||
|
- Better bottleneck detection
|
||
|
- Improved optimization recommendations
|